With only three days left to the Iowa Caucuses get underway, a process given too much importance to by the way, here is a list of what to look for in a candidate. Before you go on please do not think this will just be about the GOP. Conservatives are not just from the GOP. However since the opposition to conservatism is liberalism and the only candidate posing a threat to the Conservative field is Obama this paper will focus on most the GOP candidates.
- Michele Bachmann, Minnesota, three terms, chair of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus. A tough conservative. See political spectrum page. But a little too tough. She is hard-core. She comes across as heartless until it comes to women's issues. But the main problem with her is that she seems unreal. She is monotoned and sounds like she is remembering her cue cards. Her ideas on paper are good. But we have seen what ideas off the paper can do in Wisconsin and Ohio. These need to be toned down but with the same premise behind them. http://www.michelebachmann.com/issues/ Assessment: Conservative values=10, Leadership ability=5. She is a good idealist but doesn't seem to be a leader.
- John Huntsman, Former governor of Utah, Ambassador to China. A good family man with seven children, two adopted. Good conservative values. He is not too hard and not too soft. The only problem with him is he doesn't act strong enough to get what he wants accomplished. Would lawmakers back him up or fight even more? http://jon2012.com/issues Assessment: Conservative values= 10, Leadership abilities= 6. A good man but lacks the strength to get things done. Sometimes a little pompousness goes a long way.
- Rick Santorum, Former Senator and Congressman from Pennsylvania. Another good family man with good values. His leadership in the Senate was moderately successful. One thing makes him unelectable though. When he talks he does not look you in the face. During the debates he would focus on the floor. This personality flaw makes him seems weak if it came to confrontational situations. http://www.ricksantorum.com/issues Assessment: Conservative values=10, Leadership abilities=7. A good man but just not the complete package of leadership.
- Ron Paul, Doctor and Congressman from Texas. On paper it seems like this is the man to be the next president. In reality, he's a nut. Everything he stands for sounds like these are the ways things should be with a few exceptions. But in reality if all he did was carried out into policy we are looking into borderline anarchy. http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ Assessment: Conservative values: 8, Leadership abilities = 7. He's more of a Libertarian on paper but more of a Democrat than Republican in his actions.
- Rick Perry, Governor of Texas. Another man with strong conservative values, but more like Michele Bachmann than Ronald Reagan. This is odd because he walks, talks, dresses, and responds like Reagan, without the personality though. It seems like he is more about soundbites but not so quick with on the spot backtalk, which may be a positive actually. A strong advantage he has is that he is governor of a large state, which is almost president of a medium sized country. His disadvantage is those who hate the last governor of Texas to be president will not like him either. http://www.rickperry.org/issues/ Assessment: Conservative values= 10, Leadership abilities= 8. A good man, too much of a robot.
- Mitt Romney, Businessman and Former Governor Massachusetts. He is another one that on paper is conservative but a good label for him is that he is a Massachusetts conservative. That is like saying a Californian Conservative. He is more moderate. This makes him more electable but it also shows he is more likely to be indecisive. he has been on both sides of the fence on many issues. Not so much a flip-flop like John Kerrey was but a mind changer. This may be a positive thing in some cases but he needs to take a stand on more issues and stay with them. http://www.mittromney.com/issues Assessment: Conservative values=7, Leadership abilities=8. Massachusetts is not the place to raise politicians.
- Newt Gingrich, Professor and Former Speaker of the House from Georgia. Not so much the traditional family man although he believes in traditional family values. On paper he is a true conservative with enough gumption and at the same time compassion in reality. He has foreign policy experience and even though he has never been a governor has enough know-how to get things done. His age is the one main concern. He would be the oldest president elected for the first term. The one great thing about his ideas is shown on his website. He doesn't call things issues, he calls them solutions. http://www.newt.org/solutions Assessment: Conservative values=9, Leadership abilities=10.
- Randall Terry-Author and political activist Democrat from New York and DC. Yes, there is someone running against Obama ob the DEM side. And
perhapsthe better choice. But he apparently was GOP once as well, making him like Mitt Romney. He is the closest thing to the TEA Party that DEMs have, which may appeal to conservative DEMs. One major problem is that he has no experience. He is like Ross Perot minus the ears and business suave. http://www.terryforpresident.com/documents/TFPplatformPlanks.pdf. Assessment: Conservative values: 9, Leadership abilities: 2. Still, voting for him is better than the other DEM. - Barack Obama- Senator, "President" of the US, from Illinois. Short version, http://www.barackobama.com/record/economy Assessment: Conservative values=5, Leadership abilities= 6.
Add these all up and here are the rankings from worst to best:
- Obama (11)
- Terry (11)
- Paul (15)
- Bachmann (15)
- Romney (15)
- Huntsman (16)
- Santorum (17)
- Perry (18)
- Gingrich (19)

